January 17, 2018 - January 20, 2018 ERWC Agenda
Tuesday, January 17th:
Tuesday, January 16th:
Henry, Leonela, Maybeline, Modi, Benedict: an ad campaign to create a homeless camp for the homeless.
|
George, Precious, Wendy, Monai, Katherine Quesada, Noelia:
an advocacy composed of parents, psychologists
|
Kaelyn, Kenneth,
Johana, Jonathan, Douglas, Cheyenne: an environmentalist group trying
to persuade the state to ban off-shore drilling
|
Stephanie, Daylan, Kayla, Shobhana, Alejandra:
An ad agency creating a campaign to help the homeless.
|
Ty, Gabrielle, Melany, Germain, Guadalupe: An oil
corporation lobbyist group trying to persuade the state to allow off-shore
drilling
|
Ashley, Nick, Katherine, Jose, Jaylan: Ad campaign to continue the city's use of rent control.
|
Divide into groups and work on the following project:
You are going to create three scenes in which you play a
member of an advocacy group trying to persuade a government agency to change a
policy, using pathos, ethos, and logos.
Choose one from the following:
You are:
An advertising group trying to create an ad campaign to help
the homeless.
An advocacy
group trying to convince the zoning department to allow a homeless encampment
in an area of the city.
A business group trying to dissuade the zoning department
from allowing a homeless encampment in the area of the city.
A rent control advocacy group trying to persuade the city to
maintain rent control in the city.
A development group trying to persuade the city to rescind rent
control.
An environmental group trying to persuade the state to ban
off-shore drilling.
An oil lobbyist group trying to persuade the state to allow
off-shore drilling.
You must use pathos, ethos, and logos in your argument.
You must use credible evidence from a reliable source to
support your position.
You must include a counter-argument.
You must include a rebuttal to the counter – argument.
Rubric:
Superior - A
|
Good – B
|
Adequate - C
|
Failed to Meet Standard - F
|
Techniques of pathos, logos, and ethos were fully presented:
Created a compelling scene(s) in which all three
techniques of arguments were clearly and completely used: pathos, logos,
ethos
|
Created a scene in which all three techniques of argument
were competently used: pathos, logos, ethos
|
Created an adequate scene in which all the techniques were
used but were not fully developed.
|
Did not create a competent scene in which all the
techniques were demonstrated or clearly and completely demonstrated.
|
Evidence: Used compelling, accurate, and credible evidence from a reliable, credible source to support their argument. The evidence was of a superior nature demanding research and thought. |
Evidence: Used accurate and credible evidence from a reliable source to support their argument. Met the standard and had some good points but had areas that needed development. |
Evidence: The evidence may be incomplete or not from a completely respected source. The evidence did not show an extraordinary amount of research or thought. |
Evidence: The evidence was incomplete and not from a respected source. The evidence showed minimum thought or effort. |
Counter-Argument/Rebuttal: Included a strong counter-argument and a stronger rebuttal backed by credible evidence. |
Counter-Argument/Rebuttal: Does have a counter-argument but it might not be
noteworthy or the counter-argument might not be very strong
|
Counter-Argument/Rebuttal: The counter-argument is weak and/or negligible and/or the
rebuttal is weak.
|
Counter-Argument/Rebuttal: There is no counter-argument and/or rebuttal or the ones
that are presented are weak and not clearly thought out.
|
Presentation: The scene(s) were strong, organized,
well-thought out and presented in a professional, serious, yet creative and interesting
way.
|
Presentation: The scene(s) had moments of strength or were
interesting and creative, but showed a lack of planning or organization.
|
Presentation: The scene(s) may have some moments of strength, but were marred by lack of organization,
planning, research, or seriousness. The scene(s) may lack creativity or
interest.
|
Presentation: The scene(s) over all lacked organization,
planning, and/or research. The scene(s) appeared not thought out and under-rehearsed.
Lacking in creativity or interest.
|
Break into your groups and work on the pathos, logos, ethos project
Thursday, January 18th:
Went over the rubrics for the senior presentations and the senior project slides.
Also shared the workshops for the "spoken word" physical project.
Friday, January 19th:
Presentations of the following scenes:
1. Henry, Leonela, Maybeline, Modi, Benedict – Advocates for Long Term Solutions to the Homeless Issue
1. Henry, Leonela, Maybeline, Modi, Benedict – Advocates for Long Term Solutions to the Homeless Issue
2. George, Precious, Wendy, Monai, Katherine Q., Noelia –
Advocates for Less Homework for Students
3. Kaelyn, Kenneht, Johana, Jonathan, Doug, Cheyenne – An environmental
group for the banning of off-shore
drilling
4. Stephanie, Daylan, Kayla, Shobhana, Alejandra – Ad campaign
to help the homeless.
Comments
Post a Comment